Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Longevity & Healthspan and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the series Cellular Senescence and Aging.

Open Access Editorial

Why do we grow old: is it because our cells just wear out, we run out of cells (or both), and what can we do about it?

John M Sedivy1* and Jan M van Deursen2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Molecular Biology Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Laboratories for Molecular Medicine, Brown University, 70 Ship Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA

2 Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Longevity & Healthspan 2013, 2:7  doi:10.1186/2046-2395-2-7

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.longevityandhealthspan.com/content/2/1/7


Received:21 March 2013
Accepted:21 March 2013
Published:22 April 2013

© 2013 Sedivy and van Deursen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Longevity & Healthspan, a new BioMed Central journal, has launched a thematic series on cellular senescence and aging, a quickly evolving field critical to our understanding of the biology of aging.

Editorial

Aging occurs at virtually every level of complexity [1]. Two fundamental cellular aging processes have been described: chronological and replicative [2]. Chronological aging is of paramount importance in terminally differentiated cells. An important component of chronological aging is a breakdown in the balance between biosynthesis, repair and turnover of macromolecules. Replicative aging reflects the ability of a cell, and its lineage, to support ongoing rounds of cell division, and is of major importance in complex metazoan organisms whose adult bodies depend on tissue turnover. Cell division is however a double-edged sword that needs to be tightly regulated: by the dilution of damaged macromolecules it can counteract chronological aging and lead to the genesis of new functional cells, however excessive replication places the organism at the risk of cancer.

Replicative cellular senescence was first described in cell culture as an irreversible growth arrest triggered by the accumulation of cell divisions in human fibroblasts [3]. It has since been demonstrated in virtually all vertebrate species and cell types that have been examined. Telomere shortening due to replicative exhaustion was the first cause of senescence to be well understood [4]. In the last decade, however, it has become evident that cellular senescence can be triggered by many intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli, including the activation of oncogenes, ionizing and ultraviolet irradiation, reactive oxygen species, pharmacological agents that modify DNA or chromatin, and even nutrient imbalances and ill-described cell culture stresses [5-9].

In spite of the plethora of stimuli, either or both of two central signaling pathways leading to the activation of the p53 and tumor suppressor retinoblastoma proteins (pRB) are responsible for initiating and maintaining the senescence state. Our knowledge of the senescence phenotypes has also grown in detail, and includes the manifestations of genotoxic stress, the secretion of certain inflammatory cytokines and tissue remodeling factors, and a distinctive type of facultative heterochromatin [10].

Recent data have implicated cellular senescence as an important in vivo tumor suppression mechanism [11]. However, solid connections between cellular senescence and organismal aging have been slower to emerge. An important impediment has been the lack of reliable assays to distinguish senescent cells from the majority of healthy but quiescent cells found in normal tissues. While a few years ago it was questioned whether senescent cells existed in vivo in appreciable numbers, today it is increasingly evident that they accumulate with age as well as at sites of age-associated pathologies. Implication of cellular senescence in stem cell aging has added renewed credence for its importance in species with considerable renewable tissues. Studies in mouse models lacking p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells, as a result of p16Ink4a gene inactivation or drug-induced cell clearance, have implied a causal link between senescence and age-related functional decline of tissues and organs [12]. This together with the discovery that some of the major aging-related diseases are characterized by accumulation of senescent cells [13] has raised the possibility that therapeutic removal of senescent cells may improve healthy lifespan. However, several recent studies suggest that senescence may have evolutionarily critical functions beyond cancer prevention [14], highlighting the need for further characterization of senescent cell function at the level of the whole organism.

References

  1. Finch CE: Longevity, Senescence, and the Genome. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990. OpenURL

  2. Arking R: The Biology of Aging: Observations and Principles. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. OpenURL

  3. Hayflick L, Moorhead PS: The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains.

    Exp Cell Res 1961, 25:585-621. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Shay JW, Wright WE: Senescence and immortalization: role of telomeres and telomerase.

    Carcinogenesis 2005, 26:867-874. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Sedivy JM, Munoz-Najar UM, Jeyapalan JC, Campisi J: Cellular senescence: A link between tumor suppression and organismal aging? In In Molecular Biology of Aging . Edited by Guarente L, Partridge L, Wallace DC. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2007. OpenURL

  6. Kuilman T, Peeper DS: Senescence-messaging secretome: SMS-ing cellular stress.

    Nat Rev Cancer 2009, 9:81-94. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Passos JF, Simillion C, Hallinan J, Wipat A, von Zglinicki T: Cellular senescence: unravelling complexity.

    Age (Dordr) 2009, 31:353-363. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Rodier F, Campisi J: Four faces of cellular senescence.

    J Cell Biol 2011, 192:547-556. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  9. Sulli G, Di Micco R, d'Adda di Fagagna F: Crosstalk between chromatin state and DNA damage response in cellular senescence and cancer.

    Nat Rev Cancer 2012, 12:709-720. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Campisi J: Cellular senescence: putting the pdoxes in perspective.

    Curr Opin Genet Dev 2011, 21:107-112. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  11. Collado M, Serrano M: Senescence in tumours: evidence from mice and humans.

    Nat Rev Cancer 2010, 10:51-57. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Baker DJ, Wijshake T, Tchkonia T, LeBrasseur NK, Childs BG, van de Sluis B, Kirkland JL, van Deursen JM: Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders.

    Nature 2011, 479:232-236. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  13. Adams PD: Healing and hurting: molecular mechanisms, functions, and pathologies of cellular senescence.

    Mol Cell 2009, 36:2-14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Jun JI, Lau LF: Taking aim at the extracellular matrix: CCN proteins as emerging therapeutic targets.

    Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011, 10:945-963. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL